Pub-AI.AI in Science

Publication Radar · Source metadata

SocialArena: Evaluating Social Intelligence in Large Language Models

Zongqi Wang, Rui Wang, Yuchuan Wu, Hua Yang, Bingxue Qiu, Tianle Gu, Bing Zhao, Yujiu Yang, Jieping Ye, Yongbin Li

Publication record

Bibliographic evidence describes where and when a record appeared. It does not validate scientific claims.

First public release: 2026-10-29 · Indexed by Pub-AI: 2026-10-30 UTC

preprint

SocialArena: Evaluating Social Intelligence in Large Language Models

Zongqi Wang, Rui Wang, Yuchuan Wu, Hua Yang, Bingxue Qiu, Tianle Gu, Bing Zhao, Yujiu Yang, Jieping Ye, Yongbin Li

Preprint posted: 2026-10-29 · Original record ↗

arxiv
2610.39247
Explicit source versions (1)
  • v1 · 2026-10-29
  1. Preprint available

    Source date: 2026-10-29 · First detected: 2026-10-30 UTC · Historical baseline

    Source evidence (2)
Abstract · arxiv

We introduce SocialArena, a benchmark for systematically defining and evaluating the social intelligence of large language models (LLMs). Although LLMs are increasingly deployed in socially interactive applications such as mental health counseling, companionship chatbots, and educational tutoring, existing evaluations remain fragmented focusing on isolated capabilities or single scenarios and evaluation reliability is largely unverified. This work makes three main contributions to address these limitations. (1) We first propose a unified three-tier framework that defines social intelligence along three capability dimensions: role-playing ability, mental state reasoning, and behavioral reasoning. To operationalize this definition, we design a role-playing dialogue paradigm with explicit character thinking for evaluation, enabling simultaneous assessment of these capabilities in a manner that mirrors realistic human interactions. (2) To ensure diversity across social scenarios and thereby prevent evaluation conclusions from being confined to specific scenarios, we introduce the U-TRIMF framework, which guides us in synthesizing social contexts with broad coverage. (3) To obtain reliable evaluation, we invest $132.4K to recruit and train human annotators and adopt a human-annotated arena-style protocol, where annotators compare model responses and provide preference labels along with natural-language critiques. We hope that SocialArena can provide valuable insights and guidance for future LLM improvements.