Pub-AI.AI in Science

Publication Radar · Source metadata

CALM: Conflict-Aware Lifecycle Memory Governance for Long-Horizon Language Agents

Chang Li, Xianhao Ou, Xinyan Ma, Hao Li, Haoyuan Xu, Jiafeng Liang, Xiaohan Wang, Jiajun Chai, Guojun Yin, Ming Liu

Publication record

Bibliographic evidence describes where and when a record appeared. It does not validate scientific claims.

First announced by arXiv: 2026-10-30 · Indexed by Pub-AI: 2026-10-30 UTC

preprint

CALM: Conflict-Aware Lifecycle Memory Governance for Long-Horizon Language Agents

Chang Li, Xianhao Ou, Xinyan Ma, Hao Li, Haoyuan Xu, Jiafeng Liang, Xiaohan Wang, Jiajun Chai, Guojun Yin, Ming Liu

First announced by arXiv: 2026-10-30 · Original record ↗

arxiv
2610.38573
Explicit source versions (1)
  • v1 · Date not supplied
  1. Preprint available

    Source date: 2026-10-30 · First detected: 2026-10-30 UTC · Historical baseline

    Source evidence (1)
    • Official evidence ↗ · RSS guid=oai:arXiv.org:2610.38573v1; arxiv:announce_type=new; item pubDate (official metadata)
Abstract · arxiv

A memory can be outdated for present-day reasoning yet indispensable for reconstructing the past. Relevance-based retrieval overlooks this tension: semantic relevance, evidence-grounded validity, and query-specific eligibility are distinct. We propose CALM, a conflict-aware lifecycle memory governance framework that decouples persistent memory preservation from query-time admission. CALM converts heterogeneous records into evidence-grounded memory cells, updates validity and lifecycle states using support, conflict, and dependency signals, and admits query-appropriate evidence through training-free or learned gating informed by temporal applicability. Across LongMemEval-S and LoCoMo with Qwen and GPT backbones, CALM outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving the best overall accuracy. Compared with simple filtering and reranking, query-conditioned admission further improves evidence selection. Conflict-blocking and robustness analyses show CALM suppresses erroneous retrieved memories while retaining useful evidence. Historical-reconstruction experiments demonstrate that preserving superseded records supports accurate earlier-state reasoning without compromising current-state answers.