Pub-AI.AI in Science

Publication Radar · Source metadata

CSO: Refining Robotic Policies via Skill Distribution Alignment and Skill-Grained Optimization

Zhiyuan Xiang, Xiang Deng, Wanjie Tao, Xu Chen, Zhao Jielun, Weili Guan

Publication record

Bibliographic evidence describes where and when a record appeared. It does not validate scientific claims.

First announced by arXiv: 2026-10-30 · Indexed by Pub-AI: 2026-10-30 UTC

preprint

CSO: Refining Robotic Policies via Skill Distribution Alignment and Skill-Grained Optimization

Zhiyuan Xiang, Xiang Deng, Wanjie Tao, Xu Chen, Zhao Jielun, Weili Guan

First announced by arXiv: 2026-10-30 · Original record ↗

arxiv
2610.38357
Explicit source versions (1)
  • v1 · Date not supplied
  1. Preprint available

    Source date: 2026-10-30 · First detected: 2026-10-30 UTC · Historical baseline

    Source evidence (1)
    • Official evidence ↗ · RSS guid=oai:arXiv.org:2610.38357v1; arxiv:announce_type=new; item pubDate (official metadata)
Abstract · arxiv

Discretizing continuous actions into discrete skills using methods like VQ-VAE has emerged as a powerful paradigm for robotic manipulation. However, quantization errors yield a suboptimal distribution for the skill prior, degrading its performance. While reinforcement learning offers a path for refinement, its direct application faces unstable encoder updates and a granularity dilemma in importance sampling. To address these challenges, we introduce Cascaded Skills Optimization (CSO), a two-stage post-training framework. First, Rejection-Sampling Supervised Fine-tuning aligns the model's observation-to-skill mapping with the distribution of successful online trajectories via supervised fine-tuning. Second, with the observation encoder frozen, Skills Policy Optimization computes an independent, clipped importance ratio for each complete skill, enabling stable and efficient updates. With a lightweight QueST-style policy, CSO raises overall LIBERO success from 80.1% to 97.5%, improves performance on RoboTwin2.0, and achieves 61.0% success across five physical single-arm tasks. Additional comparisons with FAST, discrete BEAST, and fixed-buffer IQL further validate the effectiveness of our two-stage post-training strategy.