Pub-AI.AI in Science

Publication Radar · Source metadata

Continuous-depth Deep Gaussian Processes

Ying Li, Sanyou Wu, Zi Yang, Qiaochu Xu, Yuhao Liu, Zhidi Lin, Michael Minyi Zhang, Petar Djuric, Alexandre H. Thiery

Publication record

Bibliographic evidence describes where and when a record appeared. It does not validate scientific claims.

First public release: 2026-10-22 · Indexed by Pub-AI: 2026-10-25 UTC

preprint

Continuous-depth Deep Gaussian Processes

Ying Li, Sanyou Wu, Zi Yang, Qiaochu Xu, Yuhao Liu, Zhidi Lin, Michael Minyi Zhang, Petar Djuric, Alexandre H. Thiery

Preprint posted: 2026-10-22 · Original record ↗

arxiv
2610.30890
Explicit source versions (1)
  • v1 · 2026-10-22
  1. Preprint available

    Source date: 2026-10-22 · First detected: 2026-10-25 UTC · Historical baseline

    Source evidence (2)
Abstract · arxiv

Deep Gaussian processes (DGPs) are appealing Bayesian regression models, but their standard discrete-depth parameterization often becomes harder to optimize as depth grows. We argue that depth is better treated as a latent continuous evolution than as a long discrete stack. We therefore propose a continuous-depth formulation in which the latent representation follows a stochastic differential equation with a depth-indexed drift family equipped with a GP-based prior. This reframes the core design choice as the prior placed on that family, rather than adopting a purely neural continuous-depth parameterization as in neural ODE or neural SDE models. We study two instantiations of this idea: CDGP, a direct GP prior over the state--depth drift, and FlowDGP, a flow-evolved prior that captures richer depth dependence at lower training cost. To motivate the redesign, we analyze how the single-sample DGP objective can become increasingly sensitive under repeated layer composition, while residual DGP is a useful first repair that still remains a finite discrete construction. We also give pathwise sensitivity analysis for the continuous-depth formulation. Experiments on synthetic, benchmark, and large-scale regression tasks show that residual DGP improves over plain DGP, while CDGP and FlowDGP provide a stronger overall story across the regimes we study.