Pub-AI.AI in Science

JEPA · 2026-10-14

Sparse-TD-JEPA: Improving Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning With Sparse Latent Task Representations

Duaa Nakshbandi, Zhiyu An, Wan Du

arXiv:2610.14400PDF

AI-assisted summary based on the paper. Consult the linked source for methods and limitations. Benchmark numbers appear after editor verification.

TL;DR

Sparse-TD-JEPA adds an ℓ1 sparsity penalty during training to concentrate reward-predictive structure into a smaller subspace of the task encoder’s latent space, improving zero-shot RL via TD-JEPA. The authors evaluate on 65 tasks across DMC and OGBench and report higher mean performance than TD-JEPA in all 13 domain-level comparisons, with analysis showing a sharper inferred reward landscape.

Why it matters

In successor-feature zero-shot RL, dense task encoders can yield diffuse inferred reward signals that reduce contrast between goal-relevant states and background, weakening the policy signal. Sparse-TD-JEPA targets this by encouraging per-example sparsity in the projected task embedding, while keeping the closed-form linear reward inference procedure unchanged.

Method

  • Identify that dense task-encoder representations can produce diffuse inferred reward signals, flattening the predicted reward landscape and weakening the downstream policy’s signal.
  • Add an ℓ1 sparsity penalty on the projected task encoder output (applied only during training) to concentrate reward-predictive information into a smaller effective subspace.
  • Instantiate as Sparse-TD-JEPA with a single-line code addition to the TD-JEPA training update; no architectural change or modification to closed-form inference.

Limitation

The paper text does not state a specific limitation on method applicability or performance beyond the described mechanism and evaluations.

Abstract (from arXiv)

Successor-feature-based zero-shot reinforcement learning methods pre-train a task encoder and successor-feature predictor on offline, reward-free data, then recover a policy at test time by solving a closed-form linear regression over a small labeled dataset. We identify an underexplored limitation of this approach: when the task encoder produces dense representations, the inferred reward signal becomes diffuse across the state space, reducing the contrast between goal-relevant states and the background and providing a weaker signal for the policy to follow. We address this limitation by introducing an l1 sparsity penalty that concentrates reward-predictive structure into a smaller effective subspace of the task encoder's latent space. The penalty is applied only during training and requires no architectural change or modification to the closed-form inference procedure. We instantiate this approach as Sparse-TD-JEPA, a single-line of code addition based on Temporal-Difference Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (TD-JEPA) that significantly improved its performance in zero-shot reinforcement learning. We evaluate Sparse-TD-JEPA on 65 tasks across the DeepMind Control (DMC) Suite and OGBench, covering locomotion, navigation, trajectory stitching, puzzle solving, and robotic manipulation. Sparse-TD-JEPA improves over TD-JEPA in all 13 domain-level comparisons. On DMC, it increases the average return from 661 +- 6 to 714 +- 3. On OGBench, it increases the average success rate from 38.0 +- 0.8 to 48.4 +- 2.3, with improvements of 13.4-18.0 percentage points on the evaluated antmaze navigation and stitching domains. Overall, Sparse-TD-JEPA achieves the highest mean performance among established zero-shot baselines in nine of the 13 domains. Analysis further shows that sparsity produces a sharper and more task-informative inferred reward landscape.

Related papers

Publication record

Bibliographic evidence describes where and when a record appeared. It does not validate scientific claims.

First public release: 2026-10-09 · Indexed by Pub-AI: 2026-10-14 UTC

preprint

Sparse-TD-JEPA: Improving Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning With Sparse Latent Task Representations

Duaa Nakshbandi, Zhiyu An, Wan Du

Preprint posted: 2026-10-09 · Original record ↗

arxiv
2610.14400
Explicit source versions (1)
  • v1 · 2026-10-09
  1. Preprint available

    Source date: 2026-10-09 · First detected: 2026-10-25 UTC · Historical baseline

    Source evidence (1)
Abstract · arxiv

Successor-feature-based zero-shot reinforcement learning methods pre-train a task encoder and successor-feature predictor on offline, reward-free data, then recover a policy at test time by solving a closed-form linear regression over a small labeled dataset. We identify an underexplored limitation of this approach: when the task encoder produces dense representations, the inferred reward signal becomes diffuse across the state space, reducing the contrast between goal-relevant states and the background and providing a weaker signal for the policy to follow. We address this limitation by introducing an l1 sparsity penalty that concentrates reward-predictive structure into a smaller effective subspace of the task encoder's latent space. The penalty is applied only during training and requires no architectural change or modification to the closed-form inference procedure. We instantiate this approach as Sparse-TD-JEPA, a single-line of code addition based on Temporal-Difference Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (TD-JEPA) that significantly improved its performance in zero-shot reinforcement learning. We evaluate Sparse-TD-JEPA on 65 tasks across the DeepMind Control (DMC) Suite and OGBench, covering locomotion, navigation, trajectory stitching, puzzle solving, and robotic manipulation. Sparse-TD-JEPA improves over TD-JEPA in all 13 domain-level comparisons. On DMC, it increases the average return from 661 +- 6 to 714 +- 3. On OGBench, it increases the average success rate from 38.0 +- 0.8 to 48.4 +- 2.3, with improvements of 13.4-18.0 percentage points on the evaluated antmaze navigation and stitching domains. Overall, Sparse-TD-JEPA achieves the highest mean performance among established zero-shot baselines in nine of the 13 domains. Analysis further shows that sparsity produces a sharper and more task-informative inferred reward landscape.